<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Regular PPC Reporting: Worthwhile or Worthless?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epiphanysolutions.co.uk/blog/regular-ppc-reporting-worthwhile-or-worthless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epiphanysolutions.co.uk/blog/regular-ppc-reporting-worthwhile-or-worthless/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:03:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.epiphanysolutions.co.uk/blog/regular-ppc-reporting-worthwhile-or-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adwordsprofessional.com/?p=520#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Agreed that Search Query Reports are the most important tool in Google.  Tricky part is doing the same in Yahoo &amp; MSN.  If you have a Yahoo rep, you can ask them for the report.  But the normal way to run this in Yahoo &amp; MSN is to look at your Google Analytics logs for those 2 channels.  They have a different broad matching algorithm than Google, so you often see completely different broad matched terms than in Google&#039;s SQR.

Thanks, TJ
ppcmaze.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that Search Query Reports are the most important tool in Google.  Tricky part is doing the same in Yahoo &amp; MSN.  If you have a Yahoo rep, you can ask them for the report.  But the normal way to run this in Yahoo &amp; MSN is to look at your Google Analytics logs for those 2 channels.  They have a different broad matching algorithm than Google, so you often see completely different broad matched terms than in Google&#8217;s SQR.</p>
<p>Thanks, TJ<br />
ppcmaze.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.epiphanysolutions.co.uk/blog/regular-ppc-reporting-worthwhile-or-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adwordsprofessional.com/?p=520#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Great post Peter, some really good advice.

I also tend to use the search query report frequently - it&#039;s great for identifying new keywords (which could be added in new ad groups) or irrelevant searches (which could be added as negative keywords). I remember it being voted the favourite AdWords report (can&#039;t remember where though!) and for good reason.

Thanks,
Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Peter, some really good advice.</p>
<p>I also tend to use the search query report frequently &#8211; it&#8217;s great for identifying new keywords (which could be added in new ad groups) or irrelevant searches (which could be added as negative keywords). I remember it being voted the favourite AdWords report (can&#8217;t remember where though!) and for good reason.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

